Tinsley v Manchester City Council and Others: CA 1 Nov 2017

The Court was asked whether a person who has been compulsorily detained in a hospital for mental disorder under section 3 of the 1983 Act and has then been released from detention but still requires ‘after-care services’ is entitled to require his local authority to provide such services at any time before he has exhausted sums reflecting the costs of care awarded to him in a judgment in his favour against a negligent tortfeasor.
Held: The LA’s appeal failed.

Judges:

Sir Terence Etherton MR, Longmore, Irwin LJJ

Citations:

[2017] EWCA Civ 1704

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Mental Health Act 1983 3

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Local Government, Benefits

Updated: 01 April 2022; Ref: scu.598476