Thomas v The Home Office: CA 19 Oct 2006

The court was asked the parties agree an extension of time for service of a claim form outside the period specified in r. 7.5. The particulars of claim were served nearly five months late.
Held: An extension of time could be agreed between the parties in writing, but the claim was struck out because there was no extension of time agreed between the parties in writing.


[2006] EWCA Civ 1355, [2007] 1 WLR 230




Civil Procedure Rules 7.5


England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedCaterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Huesca De Crean QBD 2-Dec-2011
The claimant sought an order to prevent the defendant, a former employee, from misusing its confidential information said to be held by her. Her contract contained no post employment restrictions but did seek to control confidential and other . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Civil Procedure Rules

Updated: 08 July 2022; Ref: scu.245408