Thomas v The Home Office: CA 19 Oct 2006

The court was asked the parties agree an extension of time for service of a claim form outside the period specified in r. 7.5. The particulars of claim were served nearly five months late.
Held: An extension of time could be agreed between the parties in writing, but the claim was struck out because there was no extension of time agreed between the parties in writing.

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Civ 1355, [2007] 1 WLR 230

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Civil Procedure Rules 7.5

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedCaterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Huesca De Crean QBD 2-Dec-2011
The claimant sought an order to prevent the defendant, a former employee, from misusing its confidential information said to be held by her. Her contract contained no post employment restrictions but did seek to control confidential and other . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Civil Procedure Rules

Updated: 08 July 2022; Ref: scu.245408