The Stena Pacifica: 1990

A clause in an agreement gave both parties an option or election to refer disputes to arbitration.
Held: The agreement was valid and allowed an arbitration

Judges:

Evans J

Citations:

[1990] 2 Lloyds Law Rep 234

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

ApprovedThe Messiniaki Bergen 1983
In an agreement between the parties, the English Courts were given jurisdiction over disputes but either party had a right to elect that the dispute be referred to arbitration. It was argued that there was no existing binding agreement to arbitrate . .

Cited by:

CitedNB Three Shipping Ltd. v Harebell Shipping Ltd ComC 13-Oct-2004
Under charterparty agreements, certain disputes were to be referred to arbitration. The claimant sought to pursue a dispute before the court.
Held: The lack of mutuality on the arbitration clause did not prevent its validity. The party had the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Arbitration

Updated: 23 November 2022; Ref: scu.216401