EAT Cox J allowed an appeal against the refusal of a review application on the ground that the Chairman had not ‘directed himself as to the wider considerations required when exercising his powers of review’. These were the nine CPR 3.9(1) factors.
Judges:
The Honourable Mrs Justice Cox
Citations:
EAT/0080/07/LA, [2007] UKEAT 0080 – 07 – 0105
Links:
Cited by:
Cited – St Albans Girls School and Another v Neary CA 12-Nov-2009
The claimant’s case had been struck out after non-compliance with an order to file further particulars. His appeal was allowed by the EAT, and the School now itself appealed, saying that the employment judge had wrongly had felt obliged to have . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 11 July 2022; Ref: scu.258134
