Thames Water Utilities Limited v Richardson, Fletcher, Codling: CA 8 Dec 2000

The Appellant challenged a finding that the defendants were not liable to them in respect of water charges. There had been an agreement with a previous undertaker whereby liability was taken by the estate on which the properties were located. There had been new developments and extensions of the private and public supplies. The supplier said that original agreement had been varied.
Held: The company had an enforceable duty to provide water to the houses. The original agreement was discharged, and the appeal allowed.

Judges:

Lord Justice Thorpe And Lord Justice Potter

Citations:

[2000] EWCA Civ 316

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Water Industry Act 1991 144

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Utilities

Updated: 31 May 2022; Ref: scu.147349