References: [1986] 1 WLR 1479, Times 28-Oct-1986
Evidence as to the content of a video recording might be admissible even though the tape itself was not made available.
This case is cited by:
- Cited – Attorney General’s Reference (No 2 of 2002) CACD (Times 17-Oct-02, Bailii, [2002] EWCA Crim 2373, [2003] 1 Cr App R 321, [2003] Crim LR 192)
The defendants had been seen on video. The prosecution sought to admit, in addition to the video evidence itself, evidence from police officers as to the identity of persons claimed to be shown on the tape. The officers evidence was offered but not . .
