Citations:
[2005] ScotSC 58
Links:
Citing:
See Also – Graeme Fraser and Company v Donaldson (No 2) ScSf 8-Sep-2005
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Scotland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230416
[2005] ScotSC 58
See Also – Graeme Fraser and Company v Donaldson (No 2) ScSf 8-Sep-2005
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230416
Lord Bracadale
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 120
Scotland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230234
Lord Hamilton And Lord Marnoch And Lord Reed
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 57
Scotland
See Also – Robb v Salamis (M and I) Limited OHCS 16-Mar-2005
. .
See Also – Robb v Salamis (M and I) Ltd HL 13-Dec-2006
The claimant was injured working for the defendants on a semi-submersible platform. He fell from a ladder which was not secured properly. He alleged a breach of the Regulations. The defendant denied any breach and asserted that the claimant had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 July 2022; Ref: scu.229407
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 112
Scotland
Updated: 03 July 2022; Ref: scu.229347
[2005] ScotSC 48
Scotland
Updated: 03 July 2022; Ref: scu.229367
[2005] ScotSC 39
Scotland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.229237
Lord Macphail
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 98
Scotland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.229017
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 58
Scotland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228974
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 96
Scotland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228973
R.F.Macdonald, Q.C.
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 18
Scotland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228124
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 75
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.226101
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 44
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.226100
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 68
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225339
[2005] ScotSC 24
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225235
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 64
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225192
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 65
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225194
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 38
Scotland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.225191
[1911] SLR 854
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.616015
[1893] SLR 30 – 767
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.613290
[1888] SLR 26 – 170
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.614473
[1890] SLR 27 – 771
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.613974
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 38
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.223592
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 27
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.223590
[2005] ScotSC 14
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222901
[2005] ScotSC 5
Scotland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222893
Sheriff Principal E.F. Bowen
[2005] ScotSC 7
Cited – Alexander Ward and Co Ltd v Samyang Navigation Co Ltd HL 1975
The House explained the distinction between an arrestment to found jurisdiction and an arrestment on the dependence. The purpose of the latter was to freeze the subject arrested in the hands of the common debtor or in the case of a ship to prevent . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222441
Lord Hamilton And Lord Philip And Lord Marnoch
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 14, 2005 SLT 225
Scotland
Appeal from – Moncrieff and Another v Jamieson and others HL 17-Oct-2007
The parties disputed whether a right of way over a road included an implied right for the dominant owner to park on the servient tenement.
Held: The appeal failed. ‘The question is whether the ancillary right is necessary for the comfortable . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222401
Lady Cosgrove And Lord Macfadyen And Lord President
[2005] ScotCS CSIH – 6
Scotland
Updated: 28 June 2022; Ref: scu.221467
[2005] ScotCS CSOH – 6
Scotland
Updated: 28 June 2022; Ref: scu.221462
[2004] ScotCS 228
England and Wales
Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.216455
[2004] ScotCS 229
Scotland
Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.216457
[2004] ScotCS 216
Scotland
Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.213681
[2004] ScotCS 213
Scotland
Updated: 19 June 2022; Ref: scu.211427
Bankrupt – A debt having been made over by a person, in favour of his wife, stante matrimonio, and by her assigned to a second husband, as part of her tocher; the assignation was found not reducible at the instance of a creditor of the first husband.
[1726] UKHL 1 – Paton – 1, (1726) 1 Paton 1
Scotland
Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.554227
[1998] ScotHC HCJ – 30
Scotland
Updated: 14 June 2022; Ref: scu.279230
[2001] ScotCS 247
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202239
[2000] ScotSC 11
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202274
[2001] ScotCS 263
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202210
[2001] ScotCS 207
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202189
[2001] ScotCS 233
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202190
[2001] ScotCS 264
Scotland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202230
[2004] ScotSC 50
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200570
[2004] ScotSC 47
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200569
[2004] ScotSC 46
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200568
[2004] ScotSC 26
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200550
[2004] ScotSC 40
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200561
[2004] ScotSC 45
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200565
[2004] ScotSC 43
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200567
[2004] ScotSC 33
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200557
[2004] ScotSC 42
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200562
[2004] ScotSC 36
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200556
[2004] ScotSC 44
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200563
[2004] ScotSC 35
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200559
[2004] ScotSC 48
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200564
[1879] SLR 16 – 530
Scotland
Appeal from – Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co HL 13-Feb-1880
Damages or removal of coal under land
User damages were awarded for the unauthorised removal of coal from beneath the appellant’s land, even though the site was too small for the appellant to have mined the coal himself. The appellant was also awarded damages for the damage done to the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.614752
The concept of a contingent liability was considered.
Held: In Scots law, a contingent liability is a liability which, by reason of something done by the person bound, may or may not arise depending on the happening of a future event.
Lord Guest said: ‘The purpose of section 7(5) . . is to value the property. ‘It does not’ as Lord Evershed said ‘require you to assume that the sale . . has occurred.’ It simply prescribes, as the criterion for value, price in the open market as between a willing seller and a willing buyer, which is a familiar basis for valuation.’
He set out the test for a contingent liability as follows: ‘Contingent liabilities must . . be something different from future liabilities which are binding on the company, but are not payable until a future date. I should define a contingency as an event which may or may not occur and a contingent liability as a liability which depends for its existence upon an event which may or may not happen.’
A contingent obligation must be distinguished from a mere spes obligationis, or the hope or expectancy of an obligation yet to emerge. Lord Reid said: ‘. . if I see a watch in a shop window and think of buying it, I am not under a contingent liability to pay the price: similarly, if an Act says I must pay tax if I trade and make a profit, I am not before I begin trading under a contingent liability to pay tax in the event of my starting trading. In neither case have I committed myself to anything. But if I agree by contract to accept allowances on the footing that I will pay a sum if I later sell something above a certain price I have committed myself and I come under a contingent liability to pay in that event.’
Lord Guest, Lord Reid
[1963] AC 235
Scotland
Cited – Grays Timber Products Ltd v Revenue and Customs SC 3-Feb-2010
An assessment to income tax had been raised after the employee resold shares in the company issued through the employees’ share scheme at a price which the Revenue said was above the share value. The company appealed against a finding that tax was . .
Helpful – In re SBA Properties Ltd ChD 1967
A court action had been raised in the name of a company without authority, giving rise to a possible liability in expenses to the defendants. One of the defendants claimed that, in the event that the company’s liquidator ratified the action, that . .
Applied – In re T and N Ltd and Others (No 3) ChD 16-Jun-2006
The court considered the application of ‘the bankruptcy template of section 382 to the rules governing the winding up of companies’.
Held: The phrase ‘obligation incurred’ in Rule 13.2(1)(b) was inapt to describe a common law duty of care in . .
Cited – In re Nortel Companies and Others SC 24-Jul-2013
The court was asked as to the interrelationship of the statutory schemes relating to the protection of employees’ pensions and to corporate insolvency.
Held: Liabilities which arose from financial support directions or contribution notices . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.396610
T.G. Coutts, Q.C.
[2004] ScotCS 208
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200499
Lady Paton
[2004] ScotCS 188
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200184
Lord President
[2004] ScotCS 200
Scotland
Appeal from – David McClelland v Stuart Building Services OHCS 28-Jan-2003
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200180
[2004] ScotCS 172
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.198897
T.G. Coutts, Q.C.
[2004] ScotCS 163
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.198799
[2004] ScotCS 128
Scotland
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.198236
Sheriff Principal E.F. Bowen
[2004] ScotSC 25
Scotland
See Also – Cairns v The Chief Constable Strathclyde Police OHCS 22-Oct-2004
Motion to ordain the appellant to find caution in the sum of andpound;15,000 in respect of the expenses of the present appeal. The appellant is an undischarged bankrupt and it is not in dispute that the normal rule is that a pursuer who is an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.197701
[2004] ScotCS 116
Scotland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.197088
[2004] ScotCS 110
Scotland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.196616
[2004] ScotCS 90
Scotland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.195666
[2003] ScotSC 60
Scotland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.195227
[2003] ScotSC 65
Scotland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.195229
Lord Macfadyen And Lord Nimmo Smith And Lord President
[2003] ScotCS 23
Scotland
Updated: 09 June 2022; Ref: scu.192735
[2003] ScotCS 22
Scotland
Updated: 09 June 2022; Ref: scu.192364
[2003] ScotCS 325
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.191253
Sheriff Principal Sir Stephen S.T. Young
[2003] ScotSC 55
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.191104
Lady Paton
[2003] ScotCS 269
Scotland
Cited – Tudhope v Park Trading As Park Hutchison, Solicitors OHCS 7-Jan-2004
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190818
Lord Drummond Young
[2003] ScotCS 268
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190820
Lord Menzies
[2003] ScotCS 243
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190844
Lord Eassie
[2003] ScotCS 233
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190891
Lord Drummond Young
[2003] ScotCS 287
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190800
A contract was made for the delivery of goods from England to Scotland. The lorry and goods were damaged by fire on the M25. The defenders appealed an order that the 1856 Act applied to allow recovery in Scotland.
Held: The Act precluded application outside Scotland. It was not appropriate to apply the Act by virtue of the fact that the carrier was Scottish.
Lord Justice Clerk And Lord Johnston And Lord Osborne
[2003] ScotCS 297, Times 29-Jan-2004
Mercantile Law Amendment (Scotland) Act 1856 17, Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190770
Lord Clarke
[2003] ScotCS 322
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.190746
[2002] ScotHC 62
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189805
[2002] ScotCS 314
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189746
[2003] ScotCS 312
Scotland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189765