Citations:
[1998] NISSCSC A25/98(IB)
Links:
Northern Ireland, Benefits
Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.240754
[1998] NISSCSC A25/98(IB)
Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.240754
[1998] NISSCSC A31/98(IB)
Updated: 06 July 2022; Ref: scu.240755
[1996] NISSCSC A3/96(II)
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.240597
[2006] NICA 8
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239131
[2006] NIQB 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239082
[2005] NIQB 79
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239069
[2005] NIQB 74
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.239070
[2005] NICA 55
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238669
[2005] NICA 53
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238670
[2005] NICA 56
Northern Ireland
Updated: 05 July 2022; Ref: scu.238667
[2005] NICC 40
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.237923
[2002] NICC 12
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.237938
Disability Living Allowance
[2005] NISSCSC C4 – 05 – 06(DLA)
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.234954
[2005] NIQB 69
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.234856
[2005] NIFET 2944 – 04
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230860
[2005] NIFET 1728 – 04
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230853
[2005] NIFET 407 – 04
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230835
[2005] NICA 38
Northern Ireland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230783
[2005] NICA 36
Northern Ireland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230784
[2005] NIQB 58
Northern Ireland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230790
[2004] NICA 46
Northern Ireland
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.230226
[2005] NICA 31
Northern Ireland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228571
[2005] NISSCSC C1/05-06(IS)
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228334
[2004] NIQB 87
Northern Ireland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228264
[2005] NIQB 43
Northern Ireland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228247
[2005] NIQB 53
Northern Ireland
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others QBNI 28-Jan-2005
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v Mckenna and others QBNI 14-Feb-2005
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others CANI 15-Mar-2007
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others QBNI 18-Jan-2008
. .
See Also – Breslin and Others v McKenna and others QBNI 15-Feb-2008
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228254
[2005] NICA 28(3)
Northern Ireland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.227099
[2005] NICA 29
Northern Ireland
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.227096
[2005] NICA 27
Northern Ireland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.226200
[2005] NIQB 35
Northern Ireland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.224612
[2005] NIQB 18
Northern Ireland
See Also – Breslin and others v Mckenna and others QBNI 14-Feb-2005
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others QBNI 28-Jun-2005
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others CANI 15-Mar-2007
. .
See Also – Breslin and others v McKenna and others QBNI 18-Jan-2008
. .
See Also – Breslin and Others v McKenna and others QBNI 15-Feb-2008
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.224583
[2005] NIQB 34
Northern Ireland
Updated: 30 June 2022; Ref: scu.224610
Application for leave to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction.
[2017] NIQB 74
Northern Ireland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.598360
[2005] NICA 8
Northern Ireland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.223530
[2005] NICA 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222112
[2005] NIQB 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.222118
[2004] NIQB 66
Northern Ireland
Updated: 27 June 2022; Ref: scu.218892
Judicial review – Criminal Justice Act 1988 – Claim for compensation for miscarriage of justice – claim is alternative under ex parte scheme – whether applicant victim of miscarriage – whether decision of Secretary of State flawed.
[2004] NIQB 57
Northern Ireland
Cited – Regina v Kansal (2) HL 29-Nov-2001
The prosecutor had lead and relied at trial on evidence obtained by compulsory questioning under the 1986 Act.
Held: In doing so the prosecutor was acting to give effect to section 433.
The decision in Lambert to disallow retrospective . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 21 June 2022; Ref: scu.216027
[2001] NIQB 18
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202144
[2001] NIQB 41
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202168
[2001] NIQB 16
Northern Ireland
Cited – Kaplan v United Kingdom ECHR 14-Dec-1978
(Admissibility) The Secretary of State had, after preliminary procedures, served notices on an insurance company disallowing it from writing any new business, because its managing director the applicant, had been found not to be a fit and proper . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202145
[2000] NIQB 30
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202107
[2001] NIQB 40
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202167
[1998] NICh 3; [1999] NI 28
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202010
Application for judicial review of appointment of a financial investigator
Coghlin J
[1999] NIJB 128, [1999] NIQB 7
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202078
[2001] NIFam 9
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202055
[2001] NICA 27
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.201980
[2000] NIQB 12
Northern Ireland
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.202090
[2000] NICA 18
Updated: 13 June 2022; Ref: scu.201936
(Discrimination Religious Belief)
[2002] NIFET 30
England and Wales
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.196410
[2004] NICA 4
Northern Ireland
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.193747
[2004] NIQB 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 09 June 2022; Ref: scu.193527
[2004] NIQB 8
Northern Ireland
Updated: 09 June 2022; Ref: scu.193529
[2004] NIQB 1
Northern Ireland
Cited – Kaplan v United Kingdom ECHR 14-Dec-1978
(Admissibility) The Secretary of State had, after preliminary procedures, served notices on an insurance company disallowing it from writing any new business, because its managing director the applicant, had been found not to be a fit and proper . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 09 June 2022; Ref: scu.192355
[2003] NIQB 72
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189718
[2002] NIFam 16
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189712
[2002] NIFam 18
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189714
[2002] NIQB 69
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189717
[2002] NIFam 19
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189715
[2002] NIFam 20
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189716
[2002] NIFam 14
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189707
[2002] NICh 3
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189691
[2002] NICh 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189693
[2002] NIFam 5
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189699
[2002] NIFam 4
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189701
[2002] NIFam 24
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189700
[2002] NICh 8
England and Wales
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189695
[2002] NIFam 1
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189697
[2002] NICh 6
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189692
[2002] NIFam 9
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189706
[2002] NIFam 6
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189702
[2002] NIFam 10
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189705
[2002] NICh 7
England and Wales
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189694
[2002] NIFam 7
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189703
[2003] NICA 53
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189687
[2002] NICA 32
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189676
[2002] NICA 37
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189682
[2003] NICA 52
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189686
[2002] NICA 35
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189679
[2002] NICA 24
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189670
The deceased’s widow complained that her husband’s will had not made proper provision for her as was required by the order which ‘ In the case of a spouse reasonable financial provision means such financial provision as it would be reasonable in all the circumstances of the case for a husband or wife to receive, whether or not that provision is required for his or her maintenance’.
Held: ‘The comparison between divorce provision and inheritance provision is necessarily inexact as the former involves fairness for both husband and wife while the latter may admit of greater flexibility as it involves the same property being available to make reasonable provision for only one spouse.’
[2002] NICh 1
Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) (Northern Ireland) Order 1979
Northern Ireland
Cited – Re Besterman, decd CA 1984
In the case of an application under the Act by a surviving spouse, maintenance is not the only, or even the dominant, consideration to be taken into account by the court. ‘In an application under section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 the . .
Cited – Cowan v Cowan CA 14-May-2001
When considering the division of matrimonial assets following a divorce, the court’s duty was, within the context of the rules set down by the Act, to impose a fair settlement according to the circumstances. Courts should be careful not to make . .
Cited – Moody v Stevenson CA 12-Jul-1991
The widower aged 81, appealed against refusal of provision under the 1975 Act from his wife’s estate. She had left him nothing. The judge at first instance had found, applying Styler, that her treatment was not unreasonable, and that therefore no . .
Cited – Elizabeth Adams v Julian James Lewis (Administrator of the Estate of Frank Adams dec) ChD 26-Jan-2001
The widow’s claim under the Act was contested by three daughters where the widow received a specific legacy and the will gave trustees a power to apply any part of the residue during the lifetime of the widow to provide and maintain a suitable . .
Cited – White v White HL 26-Oct-2000
The couple going through the divorce each had substantial farms and wished to continue farming. It had been a long marriage.
Held: Where a division of the assets of a family would satisfy the reasonable needs of either party on an ancillary . .
Cited – Krubert, Re; Krubert v Davis and Others CA 27-Jun-1996
The beneficiaries under the will appealed against an order under the 1975 Act, effectively transferring the entire estate to the surviving spouse.
Held: The effect of sections 1, 2 and the other material provisions of the 1975 Act is that on . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189690
[2002] NICh 4
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189688
[2002] NICh 2
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189689
[2003] NICA 46(3)
Northern Ireland
See Also – Robinson v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland CANI 28-Nov-2003
. .
See Also – Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland and Others HL 25-Jul-2002
The Northern Ireland Parliament had elected its first minister and deputy more than six weeks after the election, but the Act required the election to be within that time. It was argued that as a creature of statute, the Parliament could not act . .
See Also – Robinson v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland CANI 28-Nov-2003
. .
See Also – Robinson v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland CANI 28-Nov-2003
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189683
[2002] NICA 36
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189680
Carswell LCJ, Campbell LJ and Weatherup J
[2002] NICA 28, [2002] NI 337
Northern Ireland
Appeal from – Mcfarland, Re Application for Judicial Review QBNI 2002
The claimant sought compensation for his imprisonment after his conviction had been overturned. . .
Appeal from – In re McFarland HL 29-Apr-2004
The claimant was convicted, imprisoned, and then his conviction was overturned. He sought compensation. He had pleaded guilty after being told by counsel to expect an adverse direction from the magistrate, following a meeting in private between . .
Appealed to – Mcfarland, Re Application for Judicial Review QBNI 2002
The claimant sought compensation for his imprisonment after his conviction had been overturned. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189673
[2002] NICA 30
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189677
[2002] NICA 38
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189681
[2002] NICA 23
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189672
[2002] NICA 18
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189660
[2002] NICA 20
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189664
[2002] NICA 10
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189653
[2002] NICA 21
Northern Ireland
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189665
[2002] NICA 25(2)
Northern Ireland
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(1) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(3) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
Cited – In re Officer L HL 31-Jul-2007
Police officers appealed against refusal of orders protecting their anonymity when called to appear before the Robert Hamill Inquiry.
Held: ‘The tribunal accordingly approached the matter properly under article 2 in seeking to ascertain . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189668
[2002] NICA 25(1)
Northern Ireland
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(2) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
Cited – In re Officer L HL 31-Jul-2007
Police officers appealed against refusal of orders protecting their anonymity when called to appear before the Robert Hamill Inquiry.
Held: ‘The tribunal accordingly approached the matter properly under article 2 in seeking to ascertain . .
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(3) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189667
[2002] NICA 25(3)
Northern Ireland
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(1) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
See Also – Donaghy, Re Application for Judicial Review 25(2) CANI 8-May-2002
. .
Cited – In re Officer L HL 31-Jul-2007
Police officers appealed against refusal of orders protecting their anonymity when called to appear before the Robert Hamill Inquiry.
Held: ‘The tribunal accordingly approached the matter properly under article 2 in seeking to ascertain . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.189669