Tag: Employment

West Yorkshire Police and others v Khan: EAT 28 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 774 – 97 – 2807

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appealed to – Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Others v Khan CA 24-Feb-2000
A police sergeant had made a complaint of race discrimination against his force. He applied for a post elsewhere, but his chief constable refused a reference claiming that he wished not to prejudice the force’s defence of the action. This was held . .

Cited by:

Appeal from – Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Others v Khan CA 24-Feb-2000
A police sergeant had made a complaint of race discrimination against his force. He applied for a post elsewhere, but his chief constable refused a reference claiming that he wished not to prejudice the force’s defence of the action. This was held . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206651

Henderson v Hunting Contract Services: EAT 1 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 504 – 98 – 0107

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See Also – Henderson v Hunting Contract Services EAT 11-Mar-1999
. .
Cited – Anyanwu and Another v South Bank Student Union and Another HL 24-May-2001
The university had imposed a new constitution on its students union, which resulted in the dismissal of the claimant. He sought to assert racial discrimination.
Held: The concept of ‘aiding’ somebody in committing discriminatory behaviour . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206590

Khan v Oxford City Mosque Society: EAT 23 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 920 – 97 – 2307

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Cited – President of the Methodist Conference v Parfitt CA 1-Oct-1983
The claimant sought to assert that he as a minister of the Methodist Church who had been received into full connection had a contract of employment with the church. Having that contract, he said hat he had been unfairly dismissed.
Held: A . .
Cited – Meek v City of Birmingham District Council CA 18-Feb-1987
Employment Tribunals to Provide Sufficient Reasons
Tribunals, when giving their decisions, are required to do no more than to make clear their findings of fact and to answer any question of law raised.
Bingham LJ said: ‘It has on a number of occasions been made plain that the decision of an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206600

Gibson v East Riding Yorkshire Council: EAT 3 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 526 – 98 – 0307

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See Also – Gibson v East Riding of Yorkshire District Council EAT 3-Feb-1999
The Working Time Directive has direct application in the employment by an emanation of the state – a local authority, and an hourly paid part timer was entitled to four weeks paid holiday by the direct effect application of the Directive, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206580

D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth: EAT 1 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 733 – 98 – 0107

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – D’Souza v Lambeth Borough Council CA 10-Dec-1997
. .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 1-May-1995
. .
See Also – D’Souza v Lambeth Borough Council EAT 18-Oct-1995
The employment tribunal held that it had not been practicable for the council to reinstate Mr D’Souza. He had succeeded in a claim for unfair dismissal and sought reinstatement, but this had been refused.
Held: An award of damages was made for . .
See Also – D’Souza v Lambeth Borough Council CA 3-Mar-1996
The claimant challenged a decision that the council could properly refuse to re-instate him after a wrongful dismissal. . .
See Also – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 2-Jul-1997
. .
Cited – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 9-Oct-1997
. .
Cited – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth EAT 14-Jan-1998
A re-instatement award after a finding of racial discrimination is in two stage process. The first part consisting of the order for re-instatement stays the balance of the award provisionally until the order for re-instatement has been complied with . .

Cited by:

Cited – D’Souza v London Borough of Lambeth and Another EAT 22-Jul-1998
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206562

Court v Gloucestershire Royal NHS Trust: EAT 20 Jul 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 599 – 98 – 2007

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – Court v Gloucestershire Royal NHS Trust EAT 7-Jul-1998
. .
Cited – Owusu v London Fire and Civil Defence Authority EAT 1-Mar-1995
The employee complained of his employer’s repeated failure to regrade him, and alleged discrimination. The employer said his claim was out of time.
Held: Mummery J made the distinction between single acts of discrimination, and continuing . .

Cited by:

See Also – Court v Gloucester Royal NHS Trust and Another EAT 15-Jun-1999
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206558

Pendragon Plc v Jackson: EAT 30 Jun 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 108 – 97 – 3006

Links:

Bailii

Citing:

See Also – Pendragon Plc v Jackson EAT 19-Nov-1997
The right of appeal from the tribunal to the EAT in matters of contract law was lost in the new regulations; there are no statutory provision for what would be a statutory procedure.. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206499

Smock (T/A Coniston Coach Hire) v Wilson: EAT 1 Jun 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 426 – 98 – 0106

Links:

Bailii

Cited by:

See Also – London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v Ladejobi EAT 1-Nov-1998
The tribunal was asked as to the date from which time started to run for the purposes of calculating the 42-day period within which an appeal should have been brought from a decision of an Employment Tribunal, if it was to be brought at all.
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206512

Stubbings v Ministry of Defence: EAT 1 May 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 415 – 98 – 0105

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See Also – Stubbings v Ministry of Defence EAT 12-Mar-1999
. .
See Also – Stubbings v Ministry of Defence EAT 21-Sep-1999
. .
See Also – Stubbings v Ministry of Defence EAT 25-Feb-2000
. .
See Also – Stubbings v Ministry of Defence EAT 7-Jun-2000
. .
See Also – Stubbings v Ministry of Defence EAT 23-Feb-2001
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206420

Welsh v Post Office: EAT 1 May 1998

Citations:

[1998] UKEAT 1139 – 97 – 0105

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Cited – Meek v City of Birmingham District Council CA 18-Feb-1987
Employment Tribunals to Provide Sufficient Reasons
Tribunals, when giving their decisions, are required to do no more than to make clear their findings of fact and to answer any question of law raised.
Bingham LJ said: ‘It has on a number of occasions been made plain that the decision of an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 17 June 2022; Ref: scu.206428