Strohal v Austria: ECHR 7 Apr 1994

(Commission) ‘the right to freedom of expression by implication also guarantees a ‘negative right’ not to be compelled to express oneself, that is, to remain silent’. Inadmissible

Judges:

MM. A. WEITZEL, P

Citations:

20871/92

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights 10

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Cited by:

CitedGillberg v Sweden ECHR 3-Apr-2012
(Grand Chamber) The applicant, a consultant psychiatrist, had conducted research with children under undertakings of absolute privacy. Several years later a researcher, for proper reasons, obtained court orders for the disclosure of the data under . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.471311