The court considered whether under a repairing covenant a wooden door should be replaced with a self-sealing aluminium door.
Held: The replacement came within a repairing covenant as a sensible way to deal with a persisting problem.
Judges:
Sir John Arnold, President, and Stocker LJ
Citations:
(1987) 54 P and CR 193
Cited by:
Cited – Eyre and others v McCracken CA 10-Mar-2000
The court considered the tenant’s covenant to repair in the context of a need for a damp course: ‘I have regard to the age, (over 150 years) and the design of the building. It has no damp-proof course . . I bear in mind the limited interest of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Landlord and Tenant
Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.235460
