Solanki v Intercity Telecom Ltd: CA 9 Feb 2018

The claimant appealed from orders refusing an adjournment of a hearing and for costs.
Held: The judge had not given proper weight to the medical evidence produced by the claimant, and the costs claimed had been excessive and may have referred to matters beyond the proper scope of the questions at issue. Both appeals succeeded. The orders were set aside and a retrial ordered.

Judges:

Gloster VP CA, Singh LJJ

Citations:

[2018] EWCA Civ 101

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromIntercity Telecom Ltd and Another v Solanki Merc 27-Feb-2015
Claim for damages for breach of contract and database rights, delivery up of confidential information and injunctive relief against Mr Solanki, a former employee of the Claimants.
Held: The court having refused a request for adjournment . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 04 April 2022; Ref: scu.604210