Smith v Croft (No 2): 1988

References: [1988] Ch 114
This case cites:

  • See Also – Smith v Croft ChD 1986
    Walton J was concerned with two appeals from the Master. The first appeal was from an order made ex parte ordering the company to indemnify the claimant against costs. The appeal against that order was allowed, and Walton J decided that there was so . .
    ([1986] 1 WLR 580, [1986] 2 All ER 551, [1986] BCLC 207)

This case is cited by:

  • Cited – Mulkerrins v Pricewaterhouse Coopers HL 31-Jul-2003
    The claimant sought damages from her former accountants for failing to protect her from bankruptcy. The receiver had unnecessarily caused great difficulties in making their claim that such an action vested in them. The defendants had subsequently, . .
    ([2003] 4 All ER 1, [2003] All ER (D) 539, [2004] PNLR 5, , [2003] UKHL 41, , Gazette 02-Oct-03, [2003] 1 WLR 1937, [2003] BPIR 1357)

These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.185416