The claimant said that his name had been removed from the company register unlawfully.
Judges:
Mr Justice Mann
Citations:
[2005] EWHC 654 (Ch), [2005] BCC 513
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Shtun v Zaljejska CA 18-Apr-1996
Evidence of prejudice from inexcusable delay is to be examined carefully. It is not essential for a finding of prejudice in such a case that there should be evidence of the particular respects in which potential witnesses’ recollections have been . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Smith v Charles Building Services Ltd and Another CA 19-Jan-2006
An application was made for the rectfication of the company’s registers.
Held: The claimant’s name had been improperly removed from the register, and therefore he was prima facie entitled to a rectification. However even if rectified, the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Company
Updated: 29 June 2022; Ref: scu.224335
