Siporex Trade SA v Comdel Commodities: 1986

The court should not absolve a defaulting party from the consequences of its neglect by maintaining a Mareva injunction order in force.
Bingham J
[1986] 2 Lloyds LR 428
England and Wales
Cited by:
CitedTryg Baltic International (UK) Ltd v Boston Compania De Seguros Sa and others ComC 28-May-2004
Four defendants from Argentina sought to have set aside an order for them to be served, saying the appropriate jursidiction, if there was a triable issue, would be Argentina.
Held: The agreements were to be construed according to English Law. . .
CitedFourie v Le Roux and others HL 24-Jan-2007
The appellant, liquidator of two South African companies, had made a successful without notice application for an asset freezing order. He believed that the defendants had stripped the companies of substantial assets. The order was set aside for . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 29 September 2021; Ref: scu.197879