Claim for return of money said to be held for the claimant’s benefit by a stockbroker.
Held: Rose J dismissed the dishonest assistance claim because Daiwa’s employees had acted honestly. However, she upheld the negligence claim, while making a deduction of 25% under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 to reflect the contributory fault of Mr Al Sanea and the company’s inactive directors, for which the company was responsible
 EWHC 257 (Ch),  WLR(D) 109,  Bus LR 1386
England and Wales
At First Instance – Singularis Holdings Ltd v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd SC 30-Oct-2019
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 24 April 2022; Ref: scu.575355