The claimant, the former court appointed receiver of the defendant’s estate under a criminal confiscation order under the 1988 Act made on the defendant’s conviction for money laundering sought to claim against the prisoner’s assets hed by the prison service.
Held: The claimant was entitled to a lien over his property to recover costs of the receivership.
Judges:
Munby J
Citations:
[2008 EWHC 798 (Admin)
Statutes:
Citing:
See Also – In Re Glatt Admn 2002
If on an application made in respect of a confiscation order by the defendant the High Court is satisfied that the realisable property is inadequate for the payment of the amount remaining to be recovered under the order, the court shall issue a . .
See Also – Glatt, Regina v CACD 17-Mar-2006
. .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Sinclair In her Capacity As the Former Receiver v Glatt Executors of Estate of Glatt and Glatt and Glatt CA 13-Mar-2009
The court considered the recovery of expenses by a receiver appointed to administer assets of money launderer. The receiver sought to exercise a lien over assets held for the prisoner by the prison to recover the costs of the receivership after the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Prisons, Criminal Sentencing
Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.334578
