A doctor claimed that he had been dismissed unfairly for redundancy and his employers claimed that since he had not accepted new conditions he had been dismissed fairly for some other reason. The Tribunal held that he had been dismissed for redundancy after the re-organisation because his work could not be excluded from consideration. His work is determined by what work he was doing rather than his strict contractual obligations.
Citations:
Gazette 14-Jul-1999, [1999] UKEAT 519 – 98 – 2502, [1999] IRLR 340
Links:
Cited by:
Appeal From – Shawkat v Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust CA 21-Jun-2001
The claimant doctor had been dismissed. He said it was unfairly, and the Trust replied that he had been made redundant ‘for some other reason’ since he had nt acceted new conditions of work.
Held: The employee’s appeal failed. The EAT had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 20 May 2022; Ref: scu.89199
