Shaw and Another v Massey Foundation and Pilings Ltd: TCC 12 Mar 2009

The appellants had argued that they were not subject to the construction arbitration system because they were residential occupiers. They now said that as consumers vis a vis the construction contract.


Coulson J


[2009] EWHC 493 (TCC)




The Housing Grants (Construction and Regeneration) Act 1996 106


England and Wales


CitedLovell Projects Ltd v Legg and Carver 2003
The court was asked whether the regulations applied to a construction contract. . .
CitedDomsalla (T/A Domsalla Building Services) v Dyason TCC 4-May-2007
A consumer has no grounds for complaining about the construction adjudication process per se under the Regulations . .
CitedCarillion Construction Ltd v Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd CA 16-Nov-2005
The parties had disputed payments for subcontracting work on a major project. The matter had been referred to arbitration, and the claimants now appealed refusal of leave to appeal the adjudicator’s award.
Held: The dispute was complex and . .
CitedCollier v Williams and others CA 25-Jan-2006
Various parties appealed refusal and grant of extensions of time for service of claim forms.
Held: The court gave detailed guidance. The three central issues were the proper construction of the rule, the question of whether the court could . .
CitedKier Regional Ltd (T/A Wallis) v City and General (Holborn) Ltd and others TCC 17-Oct-2008
The claimant sought to make final an interim third party debt order. The defendants sought a stay of the enforcement. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.


Updated: 23 July 2022; Ref: scu.324693