A right of way of necessity may be implied for purposes contemplated at the date of the grant but not yet implemented.
Judges:
Pearson J
Citations:
(1886) 31 Ch D 679
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Sweet and Another v Sommer and Another ChD 25-Jun-2004
Part of land had been sold off. By oversight no right of way had been taken in favour of the retained land. The dominant owner argued that by demolition of a building a means of access could be found and that therefore no right of way by necessity . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Land
Updated: 28 June 2022; Ref: scu.258294
