The asylum seeker had sought support from the Secretary of State. That assistance had been granted subject to a condition that she live where directed. She sought to appeal.
Held: There was no right of appeal against the condition. The jurisdiction must come from section 103(2). That section made it clear that a right of appeal lay only of the support was stopped. There had to be two decisions, a grant of and a withdrawal of support. There was no pre-existing support grant to support an appeal.
Judges:
Silber J
Citations:
Times 29-Nov-2002, Gazette 19-Dec-2002, [2002] EWHC 2218 (Admin)
Links:
Statutes:
Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 95 103(2)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Regina (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator and Another (Ahment Godan) CA 28-Oct-2003
The applicant was an asylum applicant. She sought to appeal a decision to stop support payments. She appealed a decision that she had no right to appeal.
Held: A decision which might give rise to an appeal only occurred if the applicant had an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Immigration, Benefits
Updated: 10 July 2022; Ref: scu.178021
