The judge dismissed an action for patent infringement on the basis that the patent in suit was invalid for obviousness, though he held that, had the Patent been valid, it would have been infringed by all of the alleged infringements.
The Honourable Mr Justice Pumfrey
[2002] EWHC 1556 (Ch)
Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
Appealed to – Seb SAa v Societe De’Longhi Spa CA 4-Jul-2003
The claimant’s action for patent infringement had been dismissed on the basis that the patent was invalid for obviousness.
Held: There was material before the judge on which he could properly conclude as he did on the presence of common . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Seb SAa v Societe De’Longhi Spa CA 4-Jul-2003
The claimant’s action for patent infringement had been dismissed on the basis that the patent was invalid for obviousness.
Held: There was material before the judge on which he could properly conclude as he did on the presence of common . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 14 January 2022; Ref: scu.174424
