Sears Plc v Sears Roebuck and Co and others: 1993

The court granted an Order against the plaintiff requiring it not to proceed with its case before the Trade Mark Registry until the determination of their High Court action. Lindsay J said: ‘the court should look to the two matters broadly and ask whether the matters are substantially the same.’
Lindsay J
[1993] RPC 385
Cited by:
CitedClyde and Co Llp and Another v Winkelhof QBD 22-Mar-2011
The claimant firm of solicitors sought an order requiring the defendant to amend her employment tribunal claim so as to accord with the partnership agreement to which she was party, and to submit to arbitration. The defendant said that statutory . .
[2011] EWHC 668 (QB), [2011] ArbLR 7, [2011] IRLR 467, [2011] CP Rep 31, [2012] ICR 928

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 14 December 2020; Ref: scu.430835