The court granted an Order against the plaintiff requiring it not to proceed with its case before the Trade Mark Registry until the determination of their High Court action. Lindsay J said: ‘the court should look to the two matters broadly and ask whether the matters are substantially the same.’
Judges:
Lindsay J
Citations:
[1993] RPC 385
Cited by:
Cited – Clyde and Co Llp and Another v Winkelhof QBD 22-Mar-2011
The claimant firm of solicitors sought an order requiring the defendant to amend her employment tribunal claim so as to accord with the partnership agreement to which she was party, and to submit to arbitration. The defendant said that statutory . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property, Litigation Practice
Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.430835
