Scordino v Italy: ECHR 29 Jul 2004

(French Text) Grand Chamber. In the context of unreasonable delay in violation of article 6(1), there was a strong but rebuttable presumption that excessively long proceedings would occasion non-pecuniary damage.
(2006) 45 EHRR 207, 36813/97, [2004] ECHR 412
Worldlii, Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
See AlsoScordino v Italy (No. 2) ECHR 15-Jul-2004
. .

Cited by:
CitedFaulkner, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another SC 1-May-2013
The applicants had each been given a life sentence, but having served the minimum term had been due to have the continued detention reviewed to establish whether or not continued detention was necessary for the protection of the pblic. It had not . .
See AlsoScordino v Italy (3) ECHR 17-May-2005
ECHR Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) – Violation of P1-1; Just satisfaction reserved. . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 25 January 2021; Ref: scu.230579