The court found that Samsung had not, in its tablet computers, infringed the registered design belonging to Apple, and granted a declaration accordingly.
Judges:
Birss J QC
Citations:
[2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), [2013] ECDR 1
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
At PatC – Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc CA 18-Oct-2012
In a registered design claim, the line drawings included one or two small features (an opening catch and a rim around the edge), and the natural implication was that no other ornamentation was intended, a view supported by the fact that the . .
Cited – PMS International Group Plc v Magmatic Ltd SC 9-Mar-2016
Overall Impression of Design is a Judgment
The respondent had alleged infringement of its registered design in the ‘Trunki’, a ride-on children’s suitcase. At first instance, the judge had held that the surface decorations were to be ignored. On appeal it had been held that the judge had . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Intellectual Property
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.462429