UTLC RATING – alteration of rating list – material day – whether proposal was to correct inaccuracy in list on day of compilation (1 April 2010) or whether list inaccurate by reason of material change of circumstances occurring on or after 1 April 2010 – whether works to building part of ongoing scheme of refurbishment rendering it incapable of beneficial occupation or whether assumption of a state of reasonable (economic) repair meant no alteration to the list justified – rebus sic stantibus – appeal allowed in part – rateable value determined at andpound;1
Judges:
A J Trott FRICS
Citations:
[2014] UKUT 14 (LC), [2014] RA 195
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v S J and J Monk (A Firm) CA 13-Feb-2015
. .
At UTLC – Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v SJ and J Monk (A Firm) SC 1-Mar-2017
The court was asked: ‘Does a commercial building which is in the course of redevelopment have to be valued for the purposes of rating as if it were still a useable office? ‘
Held: Appeal from decision of CA granted. On the facts found by the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Rating
Updated: 21 July 2022; Ref: scu.522657
