(Antigua and Barbuda) The parties disputed the effect of a joint venture of the sale of an additional range of cars through a car showroom. One party said the other had misrepresented thir contractual status, and the other said that an approach had been made to the main distributors within such a short time as to show bad faith.
Held: The Court of Appeal had reversed the trial judge’s findings as to the honesty of a party. As an appellate court it was wrong to disturb such a finding. Appeal allowed.
Judges:
Lord Hoffmann, Lord Millett, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers (The Master of the Rolls), Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lord Carswell
Citations:
[2005] UKPC 27
Links:
Citing:
Applied – Akerhielm v De Mare PC 1959
A company prospectus contained the following: ‘About a third of the capital has already been subscribed in Denmark.’ Though the directors believed this to be true, it was not true at the time the prospectus was issued.
Held: The statement was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Commonwealth, Contract
Updated: 01 July 2022; Ref: scu.228318
