Russell v Fox Print Services Llp and Another: EAT 19 Dec 2012

EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION – Disability
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Imposition of deposit
Appeal against a finding that the ET finding that Appellant was not disabled was a finding open to it on the evidence which included the Appellant’s witness statement as well as medical evidence.
Deposit order quashed on the ground that there was no adequate reasoning explaining why the ET considered the Appellant had little reasonable prospect of success: Meek applied.

Judges:

Birtles J

Citations:

[2012] UKEAT 0544 – 12 – 1912

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471292