EAT Practice and Procedure – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Bias
There is no practical utility in hearing interim appeals against pre-hearing orders and bias when the EAT has already rejected or stayed 10, and a full hearing at the Employment Tribunal is under way at day 25 of 35. Allegations of bias should be considered at the end of the hearing R v. Abdroikof [2007] 1 WLR 2679 HL. One appeal rejected under Rule 3(10), two others adjourned, all 7 others stayed until 42 days after the Judgment.
Judges:
McMullen QC J
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 1382 – 07 – 1203
Links:
Citing:
Cited – Regina v Abdroikof, Regina v Green; Regina v Williamson HL 17-Oct-2007
The House was asked whether a jury in criminal trials containing variously a Crown Prosecution Service solicitor, or a police officer would have the appearance of bias. In Abdroikof, the presence of the police officer on the jury was discovered only . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.266412
