ECJ Opinion – Appeal – Community trade mark – Trade mark which has a reputation for the purposes of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 40/94 – Conditions governing protection – Invalidity proceedings – Rule 38 of Regulation No 2868/95 – Obligation to produce, in the language of the proceedings, the documents supporting the application for a declaration of invalidity – Decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM – Review by the Courts (Article 63 of Regulation No 40/94) – Duty to state reasons (Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94)
Judges:
Mengozzi AG
Citations:
C-100/11, [2012] EUECJ C-100/11 – P
Links:
Statutes:
Cited by:
Opinion – Rubinstein And L’Oreal v OHIM ECJ 10-May-2012
ECJ Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(5) – Community word marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL – Community and national figurative and word marks BOTOX – Declaration of invalidity – . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
European, Intellectual Property
Updated: 28 October 2022; Ref: scu.459563
