The defendant appealed against a finding that its consultation over the rationalisation of pediatric cardiac surgical facilities had been defective and unlawful.
Judges:
Arden, Richards, LJJ, Sir Stephen Sedley
Citations:
[2012] EWCA Civ 472
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Appeal from – Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts and Another Admn 7-Nov-2011
The claimant, the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust sought to quash as flawed and unlawful a consultation by the first defendant concerning the reconfiguration of paediatric congenital cardiac services (PCCS) in England. . .
See Also – Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust v Joint Committee of Primary Care Trusts and Others (Costs) Admn 15-Dec-2011
. .
Cited by:
Cited – Moseley, Regina (on The Application of) v London Borough of Haringey SC 29-Oct-2014
Consultation requirements
The claimant challenged a decision of the respondent reducing the benefits under the Council Tax Reduction Scheme reducing Council Tax for those in need, saying that the Council’s consultation had been inadequate.
Held: The consultation was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Health Professions, Administrative
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.452830
