(Grand Chamber) Complaint as to non-disclosure of prosecution evidence.
Judges:
Wildhaber P
Citations:
[2000] ECHR 91
Links:
Statutes:
European Convention on Human Rights 5 6.1
Citing:
Conjoined Hearing – Jasper v The United Kingdom ECHR 16-Feb-2000
Grand Chamber – The defendants had been convicted after the prosecution had withheld evidence from them and from the judge under public interest immunity certificates. They complained that they had not had fair trials.
Held: The right was . .
Conjoined Hearing – Fitt v United Kingdom ECHR 16-Feb-2000
(Grand Chamber) Complaint as to non-disclosure of prosecution evidence. . .
Cited by:
Conjoined Hearing – Amann v Switzerland ECHR 16-Feb-2000
(Grand Chamber) Complaint as to non-disclosure of prosecution evidence.
Held: The holding and use of the information in question had not been ‘in accordance with the law’, as required by article 8(2), because of the absence from the relevant . .
Conjoined Hearing – Jasper v The United Kingdom ECHR 16-Feb-2000
Grand Chamber – The defendants had been convicted after the prosecution had withheld evidence from them and from the judge under public interest immunity certificates. They complained that they had not had fair trials.
Held: The right was . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights, Criminal Practice
Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.471640
