Riniker v University College London: EAT 23 Aug 1999

EAT Contract of Employment – Breach of Contract
EAT Contract of Employment – Breach of Contract.

The Honourable Mr Justice Morison (P)
EAT/1236/95, EAT/962/95, [1999] UKEAT 962 – 95 – 2308, EAT/962/95 EAT/1236/95 EAT/
Bailii, EAT
England and Wales
Citing:
See AlsoRiniker v University College London EAT 12-Dec-1995
. .
See AlsoRiniker v University College London EAT 5-Feb-1997
. .
See AlsoRegina v Lord Chancellor and others ex parte Riniker CA 28-Feb-1997
The applicant sought judicial review of a refusal of her request that a judgment of the Court of Appeal should not be published.
Held: The applicants complaints were not well founded. ‘Her attempt to restrain publication of the Court of Appeal . .
See AlsoRiniker v University College London CA 25-Nov-1998
. .
CitedRiniker v University College London CA 31-Mar-1999
The writ office of the High Court unjustifiably rejected a writ which the plaintiff asked to be issued and did not issue it until the limitation period had expired. The court held that it had inherent jurisdiction to direct that the writ should be . .

Cited by:
Appeal fromRiniker v University College London (Practice Note) CA 5-Apr-2001
The Employment Appeal Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal which does not set out to disturb any part of the order made by the original tribunal. There is no inherent power in the Court of Appeal to bypass the prohibition in . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 21 January 2022; Ref: scu.171681