Rex v Orbell: 1703

The indictment stated that the defendants had fraudulently and per conspirationem, to cheat J.S. of his money, got him to lay a certain sum of money upon a foot race and prevailed with the party to run ‘booty’.
Held: No false representation was made to J.S. and he was not led to believe something to be true which was in fact false.

Citations:

(1703) 87 ER 804, (1703) 6 Mod 42,

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedScott v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; Regina v Scott HL 20-Nov-1974
The defendant had been accused of conspiracy to produce pirate copies of films obtained by purchasing copies from cinema owners without the knowledge or consent of the copyright owners.
Held: To establish a conspiracy to defraud, it was not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 14 November 2022; Ref: scu.324668