References: [1916-17] All ER Rep 38, [1917] 12 CAR 81
Statutes: Perjury Act 1911 4
This case is cited by:
- Applied – Regina v Beck CACD 1982
The defendant complained that the judge had failed to direct the jury about the dangers of relying upon the evidence of witnesses who, though not co-defendants, had their own conflicting interests. They also said that corroborative evidence should . .
([1982] CLY 563, [1982] 1 WLR 461, [1982] 1 All ER 807) - Cited – Regina v Cooper CACD 5-May-2010
The defendant appealed his conviction for perjury. On being accused of using a mobile phone when driving, he claimed to have been using a hands free system. Evidence later showed that his kit had been fitted only after the date of the alleged . .
(, [2010] EWCA Crim 979, [2010] WLR (D) 115, , [2010] 2 Cr App R 13, (2010) 174 JP 265, [2010] 1 WLR 2390, [2010] Crim LR 949)
These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.191974
