Sentencing judges should be astute to ensure that they are satisfied that agreements on the amount to be recovered by way of confiscation orders are soundly based.
Judges:
Toulson LJ, McCombe, David Clarke JJ
Citations:
[2009] EWCA Crim 214, [2009] 2 Cr App R (S) 66, [2009] Crim LR 469
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – White and Others v Regina CACD 5-May-2010
The defendants appealed against confiscation orders made after a finding that they had been involved (separately) in the smuggling of tobacco, suggesting a conflict between the 1992 Regulations and the Directive.
Held: The appeals variously . .
Cited – Mackle, Regina v SC 29-Jan-2014
Several defendants appealed against confiscation orders made against them on convictions for avoiding customs and excise duty by re-importing cigarettes originally intended for export. They had accepted the orders being made by consent, but now . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Sentencing, Customs and Excise
Updated: 04 July 2022; Ref: scu.311779
