Reuss v Picksley: 1866

A written proposal was purportedly accepted orally. The requirements of the 1677 Statute were satisfied where a signed written offer containing the requisite terms was accepted orally by the other party.
Willes J said: ‘The only question is, whether it is sufficient to satisfy the statute that the party charged should sign what he proposes as an agreement, and that the other party should afterwards assent without writing to the proposal? As to this it is clear, both on reasoning and authority, that the proposal so signed and assented to, does become a memorandum or note of an agreement within the 4th section of the statute.’

Judges:

Willes J

Citations:

(1866) LR 1 Ex 342, [1866] 4 HandC 588, [1866] 35 LJ Ex 218, [1866] 15 LT 25, [1866] 12 Jur NS 628, [1866] 14 WR 924 ex Ch

Statutes:

Statute of Frauds 1677 4

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedParker v Clark 1960
A written offer was accepted in writing by a letter that became lost. Although it was recognised that oral evidence of the written acceptance might provide an answer, the case was argued on the basis that the written offer was a sufficient . .
CitedMehta v J Pereira Fernandes SA ChD 7-Apr-2006
The parties were in dispute. The now respondent threatened winding up. The appellant had someone in his company send an email requesting an adjournment and apparently giving a personal guarantee to a certain amount. The application was adjourned, . .
CitedGolden Ocean Group Ltd v Salgaocar Mining Industries Pvt Ltd and Another CA 9-Mar-2012
The court was asked ‘whether a contract of guarantee is enforceable where contained not in a single document signed by the guarantor but in a series of documents duly authenticated by the signature of the guarantor. It is common in commercial . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Contract

Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.241711