Regina v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd and others (No 5): HL 28 Oct 1999

A member state’s breach of European Law, where the law was clear and the national legislation had the effect of discriminating unlawfully against citizens of other members states, was sufficiently serious to justify an award of damages against that member state for the individuals adversely affected.
Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Clyde
Times 03-Nov-1999, Gazette 10-Nov-1999, [1999] UKHL 44, [1999] 3 WLR 1062, [2000] Eu LR 40, [1999] 3 CMLR 597, [2000] 1 AC 524, [1999] 4 All ER 906
House of Lords, House of Lords, House of Lords, Bailii
England and Wales
Citing:
See AlsoRegina v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd HL 26-Jul-1990
(Interim Relief Order) . .
See AlsoRegina v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex parte Factortame Ltd HL 18-May-1989
The applicants were companies owned largely by Spanish nationals operating fishing vessels within UK waters. The 1988 Act required them to re-register the vessels as British fishing vessels. The sought suspension of enforcement pending a reference . .
See AlsoRegina v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No 2) HL 11-Oct-1990
The validity of certain United Kingdom legislation was challenged on the basis that it contravened provisions of the EEC Treaty by depriving the applicants of their Community rights to fish in European waters, and an interlocutory injunction was . .

Cited by:
CitedSomerville v Scottish Ministers HL 24-Oct-2007
The claimants complained of their segregation while in prison. Several preliminary questions were to be decided: whether damages might be payable for breach of a Convention Right; wheher the act of a prison governor was the act of the executive; . .
CitedChester, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Justice SC 16-Oct-2013
The two applicants were serving life sentences for murder. Each sought damages for the unlawful withdrawal of their rights to vote in elections, and the failure of the British parliament to take steps to comply with the judgment.
Held: The . .
CitedMiller and Another, Regina (on The Application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting The European Union SC 24-Jan-2017
Parliament’s Approval if statute rights affected
In a referendum, the people had voted to leave the European Union. That would require a notice to the Union under Article 50 TEU. The Secretary of State appealed against an order requiring Parliamentary approval before issuing the notice, he saying . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 03 January 2021; Ref: scu.159028