Regina v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex parte Lawrie Plantation Services: HL 24 Jun 1999

The word ‘consideration’ when looked at in the context of planning laws was not to be construed narrowly as valuable consideration as would be the case in contract law, but should be construed purposively, looking at the Act. In this case flats used for employees were being used in a way which contravened the purpose of limiting use by transitory visitors.

Judges:

Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Clyde, Lord Millett

Citations:

Times 12-Jul-1999, [1999] 1 WLR 1415, [1999] 3 ALL ER 929, [1999] UKHL 32

Links:

House of Lords, Bailii

Statutes:

Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

Appeal fromRegina v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea ex parte Lawrie Plantation Services Admn 28-Feb-1997
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Planning

Updated: 23 May 2022; Ref: scu.135145