Regina v Rooney: CA 12 Jul 2006

The appellant appealed her conviction under the 1998 Act. As a police support worker, she had used the Force’s computer to access information about former boyfriend. She replied that the access was simply for the purpose of ensuring the records were up to date. She now said that to say to her sister that the data subjects ‘lived in Tunstall’ was not personal data since it did not suffciently identify the subjects and that her acquittals on some charges amounted to inconsistent verdicts.
Held: The appeal failed. The defendant had not shown that the verdicts were logically inconsistent.

Judges:

Gage LJ, Bean J, Goldsack J

Citations:

[2006] EWCA Crim 1841

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

Data Protection Act 1998

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedRegina v B CACD 15-May-1997
The Court upheld a conviction in respect of an Appellant who had been convicted of three offences on a six-count indictment. He was acquitted of the other three. In respect of each of the six counts the Prosecution relied upon the uncorroborated . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime, Information

Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.248237