The court considered the correctness of the Divisional Court interfering in interlocutory orders in magistrates court proceedings: ‘The obligation of this Court to keep out of the way until the magistrate has finished his determination seems to me to be a principle properly to be applied both to summary trial and to committal proceedings.’
Judges:
Lord Widgery CJ
Citations:
[1978] 68 Cr App R 114
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Hoar-Stevens v Richmond Magistrates’ Court Admn 23-Oct-2003
The court considered an application to quash an order requiring the attendance of the claimant to give evidence: ‘Normally this court will not entertain an application for a quashing order in relation to a decision made in a magistrates’ court where . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Magistrates
Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.226027
