Premises were used for the performance of acts which were ‘seriously indecent and, in some respects, revolting’, and the public was invited to resort to the premises for indulging in ‘perverted and revolting practices’.
Held: The conviction for keeping a disorderly house was upheld.
Citations:
[1962] 2 QB 24
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Court, Regina v CACD 9-Feb-2012
The defendants appealed against their convictions under common law for keeping a disorderly house. They were landlords using an agreement requiring the tenant not to be used for immoral purposes. There was evidence of limited sexual activity. Only . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Crime
Updated: 06 May 2022; Ref: scu.451142
