Regina v Preston and Others: CACD 17 Jun 1992

Evidence from telephone taps cannot be obtained for prosecution, and were inadmissible in court having been obtained unfairly.
Gazette 17-Jun-1992
Interception of Communications Act 1985 9, 2-2-b
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal fromRegina v Preston, Preston, Clarke Etc HL 5-Nov-1993
Telephone tapping evidence consisting of tapping records are to be destroyed after their use for the purpose obtained, but a prosecution was not within that purpose. The underlying purpose of the 1985 Act is to protect information as to the . .

These lists may be incomplete.
Updated: 08 April 2021; Ref: scu.87575