Regina v Preddy; Regina v Slade; Regina v Dhillon (Conjoined Appeals): CACD 1995

The electronic transfer of funds moves no identifiable property capable of being the subject of a charge of obtaining property by deception.

Citations:

[1995] Crim L R 564

Statutes:

Theft Act 1968 15(1)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal from – Regina v Preddy; Regina v Slade; Regina v Dhillon (Conjoined Appeals) HL 10-Jul-1996
The appellants were said to have made false mortgage applications. They appealed convictions for dishonestly obtaining property by deception.
Held: A chose in action created by an electronic bank transfer was not property which was capable of . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime

Updated: 15 May 2022; Ref: scu.87568