This was a renewed application for leave to apply for judicial review of decisions of the Panel not to adjourn its disciplinary proceedings against Mr Fayed.
Judges:
Neill LJ, Steyn LJ
Citations:
[1992] BCC 524
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v Executive Counsel of the JDS, ex parte Hipps ChD 1996
The court considered the law as to whether disciplinary procedings should be stayed pending the outcome of civil proceedings.
Held: The court was not reviewing the decision not to adjourn the proceedings, but exercising an original . .
Cited – Regina v Chance, ex parte Smith QBD 1995
The applicant sought to delay disciplinary proceedings by the accountancy body pending the outcome of civil litigation over a related matter.
Held: ‘ . . as Parliament has entrusted the initial valuation of the case against the applicants to . .
Cited – Land and others v the Executive Counsel of the Joint Disciplinary Scheme QBD 15-Oct-2002
The applicants were partners and staff in Ernst and Young. They sought a stay of disciplinary proceedings brought against them by the accountancy regulators pending resolution of the civil claim against them in respect of closely related issues . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Financial Services
Updated: 24 July 2022; Ref: scu.198151
