A recorded prisoner’s telephone call from prison was admissible in evidence without the defence having any right to challenge it, where the interceptor established a presumption of consent to the interception because of warnings given to prisoners.
Buxton LJ, Blofield J Tucker QC HHJ
Times 11-Nov-1998, [1999] 2 Cr App R 59, [1998] EWCA Crim 3142, [1999] 1 WLR 949
Bailii
Interception of Communications Act 1985 9
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v P and others HL 19-Dec-2000
Where communications had been intercepted in a foreign country, and the manner of such interceptions had been lawful in that country, the evidence produced was admissible in evidence in a trial in England. An admission of such evidence was not an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Evidence
Leading Case
Updated: 10 November 2021; Ref: scu.87504
