Regina v Mustaq: CACD 2005

It is unlawful for a court, as a public authority for the purposes of s. 6(3) of the 1998 Act, to act in a way incompatible with defendant’s rights enshrined in article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Judges:

Lord Roger

Citations:

[2005] 2 Cr Ap R 32

Statutes:

Human Rights Act 1998 6(3), European Convention on Human Rights 6

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedHammerton v Hammerton CA 23-Mar-2007
The husband appealed against his committal for contempt of a court order in family proceedings. The court had heard the wife’s application for his committal at the same time as his application for contact with the children.
Held: The appeal . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Crime, Human Rights

Updated: 26 August 2022; Ref: scu.250483