The defendant appealed against a travel restriction order made on his conviction on a plea for fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on importation of a controlled drug.
Held: When making any such order the court was obliged to give reasons. The court should start with the particular circumstances and then allow first for the public interest of preventing re-offending and then any effect on the defendant’s ability to work, and any mitigation.
Judges:
Laws LJ, Newmand, Keith JJ
Citations:
Times 01-Apr-2004, [2004] EWCA Crim 629
Links:
Statutes:
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 33, Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 170(2)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Regina v Hancox and Another CACD 4-Feb-2010
The defendants appealed against the imposition on them of serious crime prevention orders under section 19 of the 2007 Act.
Held: The appeals failed. To make the order, the court must satisfy itself that it had reasonable grounds to believe . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Sentencing
Updated: 10 June 2022; Ref: scu.195746
