Regina v Maynard and Other: CACD 1979

It is the duty of the trial judge to control vexatious, unfair, misleading or irrelevant cross-examination.

Citations:

(1979) 69 Cr App R 309

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Wakely 7-Jun-1990
(High Court of Australia) The defendants appealed against their convictions, saying that their cross examinations had been improperly restricted by the judge at trial.
Held: The court considered the limit of permissible cross-examination. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 09 February 2022; Ref: scu.470726